California court orders re-examination of Scott Peterson’s murder convictions


Less than two months after overturning his death penalty, the California Supreme Court has ordered a trial judge to consider whether to overturn Scott Peterson’s convictions for murdering his wife, Laci, and their unborn son, according to a report.

The court sent the case back to the San Mateo County Superior Court to determine whether Peterson should get a new trial, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Juror Richelle Nice committed “prejudicial misconduct” by not disclosing that she had filed a lawsuit in 2000 to obtain a restraining order after her boyfriend’s ex-girlfriend harassed her while she was pregnant, according to the paper.

Nice, who was initially an alternate and replaced a discharged juror during deliberations, published a book with several other members of the jury about their experience during the 2004 trial.

When asked as a potential juror whether she had ever been a victim of a crime or involved in a lawsuit, she said she hadn’t, Peterson’s attorneys told the LA Times.

But in 2000, Nice was 4½ months pregnant when she was threatened by her boyfriend’s ex, according to Peterson’s lawyers.

She said she feared for her unborn child when she filed a lawsuit to obtain a restraining order against the woman.

The attacker — who was tried based on Nice’s charges — was convicted and sentenced to a week in the slammer, Peterson’s lawyers said.

In the case that made headlines around the globe, Peterson was convicted in 2004 of first-degree murder of his 27-year-old wife, who was eight months pregnant when she disappeared on Christmas Eve 2002.

Laci Peterson and Scott Peterson

Members of the Scott Peterson jury

AFP via Getty Images

Call yourself a Deadhead? You might get more than you…


View Slideshow